The meeting was different from what I expected, like the original way to organize the participation, through the panel discussions, which bring together different views from various countries and is more dynamic. However, I feel it really lacks interventions from the grass-root level. For the YCW and myself, this helps to understand the issues that the ILO tackles, like Global Supply Chain, labour migration and decent work, from the perspective of young workers. Every year, we also attend the ILC in Geneva, so this is very relevant. For us, this is not only a moment to lobby for our demands, but also the networking aspect is important. For instance, during this meeting we met a representative from the Singapore trade union, and since we would like to also extend our work there, they offered their assistance to facilitate the start up. Labour migration is an issue that stood out, because after our YCW International council, the YCW provides specific input, but our analysis is still not very clear. In Europe, the focus is currently more on refugees, but here in Asia, the context is different and labour migration is more important for young workers. The Global Supply Chain is in our opinion is part of the major causes of precarious work, like flexibility and outsourcing. The intervention from the government delegate from the Philippines indicated to me that they want to end contractualization, which is an important demand for us. If I could have made an intervention, it would have been on social protection for young and migrant workers, because this is a right that is currently not respected in most of the Asia Pacific countries.